|
Interservice
Procedures for Instructional Systems Development :
Executive Summary and Model (Continued...)
by Robert K. Branson, Gail T. Rayner and J. Lamarr Cox
actually bringing the instruction on-line and operating it. The
Phase IV
effort continues as long as there is a need for the instruction.
Phase V, CONTROL,
deals with procedures and techniques for maintaining instructional
quality control standards and for providing data from internal and
external sources upon which revision decisions can be based. Data
collection, evaluation of the data, and decision making about the
implications of the data represent the three principal functions
described in Phase V.
Emphasis is placed on the importance of determining whether the
trainees are learning what was intended, and upon determining whether
what they have learned is of the expected benefit to the receiving
command. A negative answer to either of these would suggest revisions
in the content or procedures in order to make the instruction meet
the need it is intended to serve.
How Does ISD Differ From Existing Practice
One way to indicate the difference between ISD and existing practices
is to point out that there are currently a number of existing practices,
some of which represent excellent applications of ISD. There are
outstanding examples of well-conceived and delivered instruction
available within the Interservice training community. However, these
efforts do not represent a very large fraction of the total interservice
training establishment. One purpose of this manual is to establish
interservice standards for the design, development and delivery
of instruction which will meet state-of-the-art specifications.
An important difference between ISD and more traditional forms
of instruction is that the ISD process, through occupational surveys
and job analyses requires the thoughtful selection of what is to
be trained based on solid job data from the field. This practice
tends to insure
continued...
Page 6 of 130  
|