|
Interservice
Procedures for Instructional Systems Development :
Executive Summary and Model (Continued...)
by Robert K. Branson, Gail T. Rayner and J. Lamarr Cox
flexibility at the local level. While a series of steps are called
for in the development of any instruction, the IPISD Model does
not specify what kind of organization is necessary to perform those
steps. Further, the Model often provides alternative approaches
to the same goals. By carefully articulating the strengths and weaknesses
of the local school, the manager can improve the total performance.
Finally, by taking into account all the specific management decisions
previously described in the Block Summaries it is possible to continue
the improvement process through time.
Where to Begin
Any school manager who has as his responsibility the administration
of a large number of courses is faced with a difficult problem of
selecting and establishing priorities for courses to put into IPISD.
Obviously some courses will not be discretionary, they will simply
be required by a higher command. This section deals with the use
of discretionary resources in local commands.
One criterion for the selection of courses would be to estimate
the potential payoff to the school if the course could be improved.
Here, payoff refers to the establishment of an increasing pool of
discretionary resources. If it were possible to teach a basic course
with fewer people after IPISD than was required before, the reassignment
of those people to other important tasks would be possible. One
payoff then is to organize the IPISD effort so that the maximum
number of discretionary resources are realized.
One of the more obvious places to look for these high payoff courses
is in the area of "high flow - high level" courses. These are courses
continued...
Page 126 of 130  
|