|
Interservice
Procedures for Instructional Systems Development :
Executive Summary and Model (Continued...)
by Robert K. Branson, Gail T. Rayner and J. Lamarr Cox
for officers, senior enlisted technical course, etc. , where the
individuals likely to be in the course have good academic skills.
At the opposite end of the continuum would be a low flow course
for trainees with limited academic abilities.
Another consideration might be to select a course which has a high
flow but which for one reason or another has not produced graduates
who are satisfactory to the receiving commands. In this case, the
objective would be to improve the performance of the graduates,
prior to attempting to realize cost or time reductions.
The decision to proceed with ISD development of a course must be
carefully reviewed. The expected outcomes must be specified and
subjected to a critical analysis. First, is it reasonable to believe
expected accomplishments can actually be achieved? Second, if the
objectives are achieved, will it really make a difference in the
school or receiving command:
1. Will it reduce time?
2. Will it be less costly?
3. Will performance meet field expectations?
4. Will it use fewer resources?
In planning IPISD courses, careful problem analyses
must be made to be sure that the course is planned and designed
to meet the expectations for it. In order to realize cost savings,
it is necessary to specify in advance as one of the planning constraints
of the course that costs should be reduced. Unplanned cost savings
are rarely realized. If it is the purpose of the IPISD effort to
reduce the time in the course, again this must be specified in advance
so that the instructional developers and designers can know ahead
of time that the intended outcome
continued...
Page 127 of 130  
|